tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2654455663519806899.post5791757490549148728..comments2023-11-09T02:43:59.293-08:00Comments on Christian Medical Comment: Doctors should identify themselves on line and respect colleagues and professional boundaries, says GMCPeter Saundershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17222354018504253042noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2654455663519806899.post-39365469709068468752013-08-12T21:58:17.508-07:002013-08-12T21:58:17.508-07:00Your informational post is great resource to lots ...Your informational post is great resource to lots of peoples, so i would like to thank for creating this interesting blog.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.healthopinion.net/ourServices_international.php" rel="nofollow">Medical tourism facilitator</a>Healthopinionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00369944467681351951noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2654455663519806899.post-71428592426159482032013-04-04T23:37:43.186-07:002013-04-04T23:37:43.186-07:00Definitely a hot topic at the moment. Generally t...Definitely a hot topic at the moment. Generally those who are opposing the GMC guidance are very vocal and those who either don't care or are in agreement (in my opinion the great majority) are not making much comment and this gives a distorted view of the range of opinions out there. A view in contrast to what is mostly being written is as follows<br /><br />http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2013/04/05/its-all-just-a-social-media-and-medicine-storm-in-a-teacup-says-one-surgical-tweeter/<br /><br />http://surgicalopinion.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/twitter-wars-on-anonymity-of-doctors-on.html<br /><br />Hope these are of interest to your readers.Henry Woohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10824214593614312990noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2654455663519806899.post-3218085295226141932013-03-26T16:29:21.165-07:002013-03-26T16:29:21.165-07:00thanks Peter!thanks Peter!Kaperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01967757795298539273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2654455663519806899.post-82980171759155785442013-03-25T14:05:59.277-07:002013-03-25T14:05:59.277-07:00Read the full guidance linked above. The full cont...Read the full guidance linked above. The full context of that statement is as follows:<br /><br />'If you identify yourself as a doctor in publicly accessible social media, you should also identify yourself by name.Any material written by authors who represent themselves as doctors is likely to be taken on trust and may reasonably be taken to represent the views of the profession more widely.'<br /><br />I suspect it would only come into play if there was a genuine complaint about people failing to maintain professional boundaries or confidentiality, being defamatory or insulting or giving incorrect information.Peter Saundershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17222354018504253042noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2654455663519806899.post-67912922270865545202013-03-25T13:45:11.351-07:002013-03-25T13:45:11.351-07:00hmmm....
I use facebook a lot but purely as social...hmmm....<br />I use facebook a lot but purely as social networking - the discussions I get involved in there are never about work issues and I wouldn't dream of posting anything about patients or colleagues. I don't use my full name though because the privacy settings aren't fault free. I may be able to keep my profile private but my friends + relatives won't always, necessarily, and may tag me in a post that is more public - so I could be visible there, which has the potential for anyone looking for me to find my friends/relatives/location.<br />Do you think this will count against me for revalidation?Kaperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01967757795298539273noreply@blogger.com