tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2654455663519806899.post4741751844954561142..comments2023-11-09T02:43:59.293-08:00Comments on Christian Medical Comment: New RCOG draft guidance on abortion perpetuates myth that abortion has few physical or psychological consequences for womenPeter Saundershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17222354018504253042noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2654455663519806899.post-15782004907103911782011-02-14T22:03:36.725-08:002011-02-14T22:03:36.725-08:00>> The College was of the opinion that in ea...>> The College was of the opinion that in each case the interests declared did not conflict with the guideline development process.<br /><br />How on earth do they expect us to believe that an abortion provider's interests do not confict with the guidance they are providing?! These people should be exposed for the liars they are. I will be writing to the RCOG, and will urge all of my email contacts to do the same. I hope you will too, Peter. As you are CEO of a christian medical organisation, I am assuming your fellow-christians will share your views. Why don't you highlight this on your website, and also send out email mailers to your members? The more doctors who write in and complain, the more the RCOG will be forced to take notice. They may try to make out that this is a religious and "fundamentalist" opinion, but I am a hindu but I feel just as strongly as the christians about this matter. I am going to ask all my psychiatrist and obstetrician colleagues to write to the RCOG and protest. They are paying subscriptions to the RCOG, and for what? To have lies said in their name. We should not let them get away with this nonsense.<br /><br />RaghuramAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2654455663519806899.post-10654129166662787382011-02-14T21:39:08.031-08:002011-02-14T21:39:08.031-08:00The RCOG draft guidance is scandalous, if unsurpri...The RCOG draft guidance is scandalous, if unsurprising, given their longstanding pro-choice stance. Those of us who are in the medical profession should strongly oppose this biased and prejudiced report. First we should insist that people in the abortion industry, who have vested interests, should not be part of the consultation. Thank you, Peter, for exposing their lies and ulterior motives.<br /><br />RaghuramAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com