The Amorites were an ancient people, who according to the
Bible were directly descended from Noah’s grandson Canaan (Genesis
10:16). At the time of Israel’s exodus from Egypt (c 1446 BC) they occupied
much of present day Palestine and Jordan on both sides of the Jordan River (see
map).
The Israelites under Moses wiped out the Amorites east of
the Jordan (including the two kings Og of Bashan and Sihon of Heshbon) and
occupied their land (Numbers
21:21-35).
After crossing the Jordan the Israelites, now under Joshua’s
leadership, destroyed the western Amorite civilisation. The kings of the five city states of
Jerusalem, Hebron, Jarmuth, Lachish and Eglon were executed by Joshua and their
people erased from the pages of history (Joshua
10:1-27).
On both occasions the Amorites attacked first.
What lessons can we learn from the slaughter of the
Amorites? Here are ten:
1. The nations belong
to God
The Amorites, like all people on earth, belong to God (Psalm
24:1) and he can do whatever he chooses with his own possessions. If he
decides to wipe a nation out, in this case by using the nation of Israel as his
instrument, then that is his prerogative. God is sovereign over the nations and
gives them to anyone he wishes (Daniel
4:17, 5:21).
He does the same today.
2. Human beings are
mortal
Virtually no one lives beyond 120 years, the limit for human longevity
which God set after the flood (Genesis
6:3). Every human being eventually dies, usually from disease or trauma.
This is a consequence of the curse of the Fall – when humankind rejected God’s
rightful rule (Genesis
3). The Amorites suffered the fate that awaits all human beings but died
through battle rather than from disease.
3. God is sovereign
over the nations
God marks out for all nations their appointed times in
history and the boundaries of their lands (Acts
17:26). He decreed that the Amorites would last until around 1400 BC.
You’ll notice that most of the other nations in the immediate vicinity at the
time no longer exist either. Where are Moab, Edom, Ammon, Philistia and
Phoenicia today? For that matter where are the empires of Assyria, Babylon,
Persia, Media, Greece and Rome? Today’s nations (and Empires) should take warning.
4. God is incredibly
patient
Have you ever wondered why God kept his own people under
slavery in Egypt for over 400 years? It was because the ‘sin of the Amorites
had not yet reached its full measure’ (Genesis
15:16). God delayed his judgement on the Amorites for over 400 years out
of mercy whilst his own chosen people suffered and he suffered with them. The
Amorites had every opportunity to change their ways but chose not to, so
judgement eventually came. We should not take God’s patience for granted. It should
rather lead us to change our ways (Romans
2:4).
5. God regards sin as
serious and will bring judgement
The Amorites indulged in sexual immorality, child sacrifice
and idolatry. These are serious sins and such a people could not be allowed to
survive. The Amorites were called to account for their sins as eventually will every
nation - and every person - on the face of the earth. Nations which indulge in
sexual immorality (ie. sex outside marriage), kill their children (eg. through
abortion) and practise idolatry (ie. greed – see Colossians
3:5) today should learn from the fate of the Amorites.
6. God delivers on his promises
God told Moses that he would drive the Amorites out of Canaan
ahead of Israel. He did, along with the nations of the Hittites, Hivites,
Jebusites, Girgashites and Perizzites. He also told Moses he would give Israel
the Amorites’ land. He did but he drove the Amorites out not because Israel was good but because the Amorites' time for judgement had come (Deuteronomy 9:4-6). But these were not God’s only promises. In Genesis
15 God tells Moses that those who eventually share his faith in the one
true God will be like the stars in number. Furthermore these people will
include not only believing Jews, but people from every nation on earth (Romans
4:16,17; Revelation
7). God will deliver on these promises too.
7. God will protect
his people
There are no Amorites on the streets of New York or
Palestine today but there are many Jews both in New York and in Israel. God
ensures the survival of his chosen people. Sometimes the only way of doing that
is by destroying their enemies. When Israel came to the boundaries of the
Amorite territory they simply asked for safe passage (Numbers
21:22). But the Amorites sought to destroy them. Israel responded in
self-defence. Those who seek to destroy the Jewish nation today need to
appreciate that it was God who put them back in Palestine and that he already has
ensured their survival against the greatest world empires for the last 4,000
years. Those who seek to destroy Christians today should note the warning of 2
Thessalonians 1:6-10.
8. God disciplines
his people
God promised the Israelites (who became the Jews) Amorite
land both east and west of the Jordan River. But they possessed it only for a
limited period of time. As a result of their disobedience to God their own
territory was reduced in size by foreign armies and they were later exiled to
Babylon. After their return they were scattered all over the world following
the fall of Jerusalem to the Romans. This is exactly what God warned them would
happen if they disobeyed him (Deuteronomy
28:15-68). God disciplines those who he loves (Hebrews
12:4-11). He still does so today.
9. There is something
far more serious than a violent death
Jesus said, ‘Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but
cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid
of the One who can
destroy both soul and body in hell.’ (Matthew
10:28) There is fate far worse than death: being excluded from God’s
presence forever in Hell. When people asked Jesus about others who had died violent deaths he warned them, 'unless you repent, you too will perish' (Luke 13:1-5). We need to remember that after death comes judgement
and that all human beings who have ever lived, including the Amorites and
ourselves, will face it (Hebrews
9:27). We need to make sure we do
not end up on the wrong side of that judgement.
10. We all need to
turn to God
The Amorites were evil people but all of us have equally sinned
and fallen short of God’s glory (Romans
3:23). We all thereby deserve God’s judgement but God offers eternal life
through Jesus Christ (Romans
6:23). God’s desire is that all should reach repentance (2
Peter 3:9) but we know that many will not (Matthew
7:13,14). God has provided the way through Jesus Christ for anyone who
seeks it to receive God’s forgiveness and to spend all eternity with him (John
3:16-18, 5:24;
Romans
10:9,10). If you want to understand more about how Christ’s death and
resurrection makes this possible see here.
If you wish to read a short explanation of the Christian gospel message see here.
god's pretty petty really!
ReplyDeleteNo. God is is slow to anger, abounding in love and forgiving of sin and rebellion. But he does not leave the guilty and unrepentant unpunished. Are you suggesting that a nation should be able to sacrifice its own children for hundreds of years with impunity? That is not justice.
DeleteAccording to your story, the Amorites did do it for hundreds of years with impunity. It was only the last generation that paid the price. How does wiping out the last of the line have any effect of the generations that came before. They lived their lives how they wanted with no punishment. Killing the great great great etc grandsons does not bring any kind of justice against the earlier Amorites.
DeleteThe majority of the world is not Christian, so is practicing idolatry. Are you saying that God will be wiping the rest of us out at some point?
Every human being is mortal and will die at some point of some disease or injury (unless Christ returns first). We are all tainted by the curse of the Fall.
DeleteIn addition every person who has ever lived will come to judgement after death and will end up in one of two destinations. Forgiveness is offered to all through Christ but not all are willing to receive it.
Those Amorites who died of disease will face judgement, just like all of us.
Yes, so judgement occurs after death. Evil people live long lives of comfort and excess and good people suffer and experience devastating loss so God and Satan can settle a wager. The Amorites being wiped out can not be used as an example of God punishing sin because He doesn't work that way.
DeleteThe Bible is very clear that God's judgement acts both temporally (through disease, war, famine etc) - see Ezekiel 14 - and eternally (after death).
DeleteAs a Doctor, do you honestly believe that disease is a punishment from God, or a living entity that is spread from person to person through contact and unsanitary practices, such as keeping sewerage and drinking water supplies separate? Is war an act of God or do people have true free will?
DeleteAnd you said that letting a people sacrifice their children without wiping them out would not be just. My point is that according to the bible the true justice is doled out in the after life because good people die, bad people live, etc, and the things that happen to us on this earth are insignificant in the scheme of things.
On the topic of working as agents of God to bring about his justice: as the evidence that the chemical weapons recently used in Syria to "sacrifice their children" (and other "innocents") is pointing more and more towards an act of the government in control, do you think we should wage a war on them?
Man created jesus, god and all this stuff. That's why they all ain't perfect, so do not Judie them so severely.
DeleteShane, thank you for being the one person on this page who is prepared to engage in intelligent discussion on this matter. I appreciate that.
DeleteAs a doctor I believe that senescence is genetically programmed and that genetic predisposition, environmental factors and lifestyle choices all play a part in the aetiology of disease. As a Christian I believe that all these factors are a direct result of the fall.
We are all thereby mortal. And according to the Bible there are no good people. Not one. All deserve judgement and all need and are offered forgiveness and redemption.
I am strongly opposed to the use of chemical weapons, to US and British military intervention in Syria and to our country supplying arms to rebel factions. I support diplomatic efforts to resolve the situation and relief efforts for refugees, internally displaced people and other victims of war. I have close friends in Syria and personally give to support such efforts.
The Amorites were a very special case whereby God decreed their end and used Israel as his agent. I would stress again that the Amorites were offered peace but took up arms and attacked Israel first. Israel was strictly forbidden to take up arms against other nations in the area at the time such as Edom, Moab and Ammon.
^^ Of course you can have an intelligent discussion about something that doesn't exist. You've never spent any time talking about movies, books or games?
Deletelol, Peter. When I checked in yesterday and saw 87 replies, I thought something interesting had happened. I'm not sure what lead to Professor Dawkins tweeting the link, but you can bet that a good number of his followers are going to disagree with you.
Sorry, I should have been clearer with my point about disease. I understand that the bible says disease is a consequence of original sin. However you implied God uses it as a "targeted" form of punishment against specific sinners. There is no evidence that God "interferes" with the natural order of the world in any way. Heck if there was, it would be proof of His existence.
Thanks for your thoughts on Syria, and the clarification that the Amorites was a special case. Could you envisage a situation of a God decreed special case today? What would convince you to follow/endorse someone that said God had spoken to them and we should eliminate a specific people?
One has to be very careful linking specific individual sins with specific individual diseases although there are some examples in the Bible. We also recognise that certain behaviours predispose people to particular illnesses (eg. smoking and lung cancer, promiscuity and STDs) but in many cases of illness there is no discernible link.
DeleteThe biblical picture focuses more on the link between the sins of a people or nation and God's judgement. This is the situation with the Amorites. The whole nation was guilty and held accountable.
God is active in the rise and fall of nations today (by whatever means) but Jesus was very clear that his followers were not to take up arms to advance the gospel, merely to obey his command to love as he loved and to speak his truth.
The issue of whether Christians as citizens should be involved in self-defence against an aggressor or participate in a just war between nation states is however much more complex and there are a variety of views on this. I am not a pacifist myself in that I think there are circumstances which justify taking up arms to protect ones family, community or country. But not all Christians would agree with me.
The conquest of Canaan whereby God specifically commanded Israel to destroy the Amorites and others was I believe a historical one-off. But this does not mean that Israel as a nation has no right to defend itself against aggressors today.
"God is active in the rise and fall of nations today (by whatever means)"
DeleteWhat is your evidence to back this up? Or what makes you think this is the case?
This is what the Scriptures clearly teach. And it is clear that the behaviour of nations correlates with their survival prospects. Most rot from within making them susceptible to destruction by whatever means.
DeleteBut their behaviour is of their own choosing, because people have free will. How does this make God active in their rise and fall? Where do the scriptures teach this, and can you give me an example of it happening in recent history?
DeleteSee the scriptures linked in the blog above. Every nation an empire is an example.
Delete@ Shane Fletcher : Excuse me, but God being omniscient, He has forever known what the actions of each and every one of us would be.
DeleteBetter yet, He knew and saw every action of every future person as soon as the fifth day, at a time where no one of these people were yet in existence to make any of these decisions. Hence these decisions are not these people's - who did not exist at the time these decisions were already known - but are God's own design and will.
Better yet, God saw every sin and every crime that His future creatures would perform, at a time these creatures did no exist, at a time then where God could quite freely change the path of things, and yet God chose to create our world and no other. God Himself chose every single sin and crime that has ever been performed by mankind.
If God is omniscient, people cannot have free will.
@ Yogi - if God can see the choices all men will make, how does that remove from them the free will they exercise in making them?
Delete@ Peter - any nation that declares war on another does so with free will, and therefore God can claim no credit. As for natural disasters of famine, plaque or attack of wild animals, these are likewise out of God's control. There is no evidence at any time that the natural order of the universe has ever been suspended. A plaque of locusts does not get summoned from nothing. They are born
From parents. We had a mice plaque here in Australia in 2011. It was predicted by the CSIRO coming off the back of a wet Summer and a mild Winter. The wet Summer and mild Winter were themselves predicted based on movement of the great ocean currents which are based on melting of ice and the change of the salinity content of particular parts of the ocean.
DeleteRegarding Ezekiel 14, the vast majority of countries do not believe in the Christian God and are unfaithful to him. There should be nothing but famine and plague and pestilence.
@ Shane Fletcher: What do you call "free will" when everything you will ever do is already written in God's Plan, and has been there even before mankind was even created?
DeleteThen you're just a robot accomplishing whatever God has always known; that is: accomplishing whatever God had already decided on the fifth day. Your decisions are his, since he conceived them at a time you did not even exist to assume their responsibility.
I don't see what you could ever call "free will" for the creature of an omniscient creator. Does a clock have "free will" for its watchmaker?
@shane The god you are describing is not the God of the Bible. I can understand now though why you think it is so powerless and why you don't think it is worth believing in or worshipping. I wouldn't bother either.
Delete@Yogi - a watchmaker isn't omniscient, so that's not a good analogy. Accomplishing what God has known and accomplishing what God has decided are two very different things. Knowing the outcome of a toss of a coin is different to rigging the toss of a coin to give the outcome you want.
Delete@Peter I'm describing the God that must exist in the world we live in. If you have evidence that things are different to how I describe them I would love to hear it.
DeleteGod doesn't exist 'in' the world. He is both omnipresent (everywhere at once) and transcendent (outside the space time continuum).
Delete@ Shane Fletcher: The watchmaker is the clock creator, that's the point you are overlooking.
DeleteGod is not only "omniscient", but is "omniscient creator", which means:
1- God is tossing all coins, since he created this world with absolute knowledge of all consequences that would ensue,
2- God having free will, he chose each and every one of these consequences, otherwise he would have tossed the coins differently.
So no one can make any decision that has not actually been decided and designed by God.
There can be no free will in a world built by an omniscient creator.
@Peter Again any evidence you have of this would be greatly appreciated.
Delete@Yogi - No, you're confusing "creator" with "omnipotent". An omnipotent God can change things to fit in with the foreseeable consequences. But a creator that starts things off may be able to see the consequences without being able to alter them.
DeleteSo if God is omnipotent and omniscient then there can be no free will. But it is quite apparent that God is not omnipotent. He cannot control everything in the universe at a whim. There is no evidence he can affect any part of the universe. But he could have started things off through the Big Bang and then been able to see what happened. If the multiverse theory is correct and there are an infinite number of universes, then perhaps God has been firing them all off waiting to see which one would give him the outcome he desired.
@ Shane Fletcher:
DeleteFirst, it is not possible to say "it is apparent that God is not omnipotent" since, if God chooses not to act, you won't realize that he, in fact, is omnipotent. "No apparent action" can be the result of "hidden action" or of "conscious decision to retain action". So no conclusion can be drawn about God omnipotence.
Second, the expressions "and then been able to see what happened" or "waiting to see which one would give him the outcome he desired" do not apply to an out-of-time, omniscient being. For an omniscient God, there is no "waiting to see what happens". Even before creating anything, God knows in the most intricate detail what will happen. That's omniscience.
So the only hypothesis you need is that God has free will. That nothing or nobody is forcing him to create this universe rather than another one. So he knows what is going to happen and chooses it to be that way, before he creates anything.
So there is no free will outside of his, in a world built by an omniscient creator.
I'm sorry but either my previous comment appears double or does not appear at all ...
Delete@Shane I've catalogued this elsewhere on the blog. I am a Christian not because of Genesis but because of the person of Jesus Christ - his words, life, miracles, actions, claims, death and resurrection. John 6:68-69 says it all for me. He is where it starts and where it finishes and from him flows everything else - the authority of scripture, the nature of God, the meaning of life, everything. Knowing him, loving him, serving him - that is all I live for.
Delete@Shane I refer the honorable member to the answer I gave some moments ago
DeleteGod created the universe nearly 14 billion years ago and then waited for his chosen people to evolve. Of course He's patient.
ReplyDeleteGod is unbelievably patient but judgement will eventually come. We need to make sure that we are on the right side of it through faith in Jesus Christ because there is no other way to receive God's grace and forgiveness (John 3:16-18).
DeleteIf you accept the preponderance of evidence that shows the Universe is ancient and all life on the planet evolved over aeons, how do you rationalise the "creation week" and a life of perfection that prefaced "the fall"?
DeleteI'd been interested in your reply to this too, Peter.
DeleteOf course, Shane, Genesis does not refer to "perfection" before The Fall. (It also doesn't call the account of Adam, Eve and the Serpent "The Fall.")
Where did I say anything in this post about the age of the earth and how is this relevant to the Amorites?
DeleteWrt the Fall, the fall of Satan predated the fall of man, so all was not perfect immediately prior to Genesis 3.
You said God was patient, and used an example of 400 years. I was pointing out that as the Universe is around 14 billion years old, claiming patience for that 400 years is akin to looking at a guy who spends 2 years rebuilding a vintage car, and then claiming he's patient because he waited 10 minutes in line to buy petrol for it.
DeleteWas Eden perfect? Was man perfect? Was the Earth and all the animal and plant life on it perfect? In short, was God's creation of the Universe, for the 14 billion years prior to the fall perfect? If you would like to address this in another blog post, I would be happy to wait. I'm pretty patient myself. ;-)
I am myself an 'old-earth creationist' and like you accept the generally accepted geological timescales. However human civilisation is very recent; the first cities only appeared a few thousand years ago so against that framework 400 years is a very long time. 1613 is quite a long time ago in human history.
DeleteTo answer the questions in your second paragraph would take a lot more space. I am very happy to do so in another blog post but some of it I think would be speculative. If by 'perfect' you mean 'without sin' then the short answers to your questions are as follows: 1. No because the devil was there. 2. Yes prior to the fall but not after. 3. We are not told but the devil was there before the fall of man.
Thank you for your patience and your willingness to engage in discussion. Most atheists are not.
To be fair, most Christians aren't either. Or any religious fundamentalist. I'm a recent born again atheist, so I'm full of that missionary zeal at the moment. lol
DeleteWell a whole new post concerns where did the devil come from. Was he created by God, without God's knowledge that he would turn evil? How are angels different from people, ie are they not created in God's image, and how does that relate to Lucifer?
But back to the points, I don't mean without sin, but the consequences of sin. Was Eden a place of vegetarian animals without weeds or death (to bring up the first 3 things which seem mutually exclusive between creation/evolution)? If man (and all animals) evolved over time, through multiple generations, how can this occur without death, if man was perfect before the original sin?
Again you are raising complex questions which cannot be adequately answered in soundbites and would need more time to unpack. I can address them at more length in another blog if you would like me to. They are all very good questions and there are a range of views amongst Christian apologists and thinkers.
DeleteThe Bible tells us what we need to know for salvation but is not written to satisfy all our curiosities. It is a book for travellers rather than armchair philosophers.
However, running the inevitable risks of brief explanations:
1. The devil is a fallen angel. He was created good but rebelled and turned bad. He took other angels with him.
2. Angels are intelligent beings but many are not fallen and so don't need salvation. They act as God's messengers but are not made in God's image in the same way that humans beings are. They are invisible but can choose to be visible for specific purposes.
3. Christians fall into three main camps on the questions in your third paragraph. Young earth creationists would see all death as a consequence of the fall of man. Theistic evolutionists would see God in control over evolution with death occurring from the outset and man evolving like other animals. Old earth (progressive) creationists take a variety of views but accept that evolution plays a (limited) role in producing biological complexity. One view is that Eden was an enclave into which man was placed within a world already red in tooth and claw. If you are genuinely interested in pursuing this I can unpack it more. I would probably describe myself as an old earth progressive creationist in that I don't think chance and necessity alone can account for biological complexity and am deeply sceptical about human evolution.
Thanks, Peter. It's good that you've highlighted the breadth of opinion of Christians on this topic - which is often (?deliberately) not acknowledged by so-called 'militant' atheists. I find it helpful to know your own views on age of the earth/perfection etc. Given how prolific are your posts, and how many times this sort of thing comes up in discussion, I think your own views on this deserve a post dedicated to that alone. Sorry if I've missed it. I myself am a theistic evolutionist and I would probably go further than your (necessarily) brief description to make the point that what appears random depends on one's perspective, and may not be from a different perspective.
DeletePersonally I would add 2 things further:
1. If early Genesis is understood as an apologetic parable using the language of the "science" of the day, setting out a "theology" very different to alternative worldviews of the time, many problems generated by insisting it to be forensic history disappear. My understanding is that this is actually the approach which treats the scripture with the most integrity, whether we're talking spiritual or academic.
2. On the notion of "perfect," the proper understanding of the Hebrew טוֹב usually translated as "very good" is not "perfect." Another suitable renderings are "efficient" and "fit for purpose" - note the same word is used in Judges 18 as the spies from the tribe of Dan describe the land of Laish. “Arise, and let us go up against them, for we have seen the land, and behold, it is very good.” They go on to describe the land as “spacious . . . a place where there is no lack of anything that is in the earth”. This hardly suggests that the land is perfect; rather, it is a suitable place for the tribe of Dan to fulfil its commission to “fill the earth and subdue it.”
More questions that would be cool to be answered in a new post:
DeleteWhat is the difference between people and angels? Can fallen angels receive salvation by accepting Christ, and why don't they when they obviously know the truth? If they can't die like human's can do they have essentially a much longer time to accept Christ as saviour? Satan is supposed to proclaim the truth near the end of days, so does he get saved then and welcomed back into heaven?
I don't understand how their can be interpretation differences over certain parts of the bible. Either you take it as fact or you don't. Suggestions that the creation part is an allegory just doesn't make any sense, because the 'morning/evening - the first/second/.../sixth day' part is very specific and could easily been replaced with equally poetic phrases about God fashioning the lands/animals through out the ages or aeons or any other term that meant a long period of time. If It also seems to me that using the phrase "God made woman to be with man" when condemning homosexuality is disingenuous if you believe in an evolutionary beginning to life on earth, and the whole point of man being perfect and living in an actual "Eden" free from death is a moot point if we had to evolve to get here. This is a large reason that I became an atheist. There is no doubt in my mind that the Universe is ancient and that all life on the planet came from a single source that evolved over time. The biological and genetic evidence is fairly plain. I am very interested in listening to your argument against evolution. And if evolution is true, then why, if God is all powerful, would he create a Universe so ancient, and see the rise and fall of so many species of animal, just to get to us and play out the last few thousand years of history that was important to him? The other option/question being, why would God make a Universe 6000 years ago, but leave false trails and evidence to suggest that the world/universe was ancient?
I think the text of Genesis 1 actually allows for a range of interpretations. Personally I see it as poetic/prophetic/apologetic. It is not history because there was no human observer.
DeleteGenesis 2-5 however are different. There are named and identifiable geographical features, neolithic culture, definite lifespans, genealogies, personalities.
Satan was there by chapter 3, telling us that the fall of angels predated the fall of man. It is not inconceivable that the fall of angels had effects on the nature of the world prior to man's arrival.
I don't see that the text excludes a long time period before the creation of man, nor a cosmic fall before his arrival. In fact I would see the creation of man as a step in cosmic redemption and restoration. Jesus after all, as well as being fully God, became fully human.
God's plan is not just to redeem human beings but the whole of creation. There will be a new heavens and new earth. This world is only the small and finite beginning of the great cosmic drama that is unfolding.
I would say Genesis 1 is not history because it is factually inaccurate. If there is one thing we have learned it is that human observation is dramatically flawed. People see things that aren't there and fail to see things that are there all the time. Scientific testing trumps observation every time.
DeleteSo where does the story of creation come from? If it is not told to man by God, then did man just make it up? The latter choice is obviously not good for the bibles legitimacy, but the former is not much better, as God was obviously lying. Is there a third choice?
So God needed to create man to redeem the universe from Satans sin?
Genesis seems pretty specific that weeds didn't exist before Adam sinned, snakes didn't crawl on the ground, and there was no pain in child birth. This is not scientifically accurate.
You are making a false distinction. Scientific testing relies on human observation.
DeleteThe story of creation in Genesis 1 was revealed. It is poetry/prophecy and not meant to be read as a scientific paper.
God's plan of salvation involves both man and Satan. The effects of the fall of man in Genesis 3 were effects primarily for man. How do you know scientifically when human beings began to experience pain in childbirth?
Scientific testing relies on repeatable human observation by multiple people. I guess I should have said it trumps eye witness accounts of a one off occurrence.
DeleteWhat do you mean Genesis 1 was revealed? And why wasn't it revealed accurately?
Pain in child birth is due to the physical act of the baby emerging through the birth canal. Babies did not get dramatically bigger, nor the birth canal get dramatically smaller over a single generation.
This is precisely why historical events are established by the legal-historical method rather than by scientific experiment.
DeleteGenesis 1 as I explained is not a scientific document but prophecy/poetry. It tells us who, why and what but not when and how.
And I thought that pain sensation was transmitted by A delta and C neurone fibres. Silly me!
Scientific experiment can be part of the legal historical method. The two sources of information can be narrative or relic. Relic is preferred because it removes any bias that might be in a narrative.
DeleteSo you are suggesting there was a rewiring of the nerves in the female body?
Relics need themselves to be interpreted and are often not present. Most history relies on oral and written testimony rather than exhibits.
DeleteI'm suggesting that you were not there to examine the neuroanatomy before and after the fall and that pain sensation is a subjective phenomenon that can change for a whole host of reasons.
And the greater the number of sources of oral and written testimony, the better the picture of history.
DeleteObviously neither of us were there. But evolution is a slow process and the suggestion that in a single generation a few thousand years ago pain was introduced into child birth, is, as you say, silly.
The claim that all biological complexity is the simple product of chance plus necessity is far from established. You have left God out of the equation.
DeleteIf you read the Bible you will see that God remained faithful to the Jews in spite of their unfaithfulness and sin. He refused to abandon them but he was very clear that he did not regard them as good (Deuteronomy 9:4-6).
ReplyDeleteSo what does slaughtering have to do with 'medical comments'?
ReplyDeleteJust wonderin'
This blog deals mainly with matters at the interface of Christianity and Medicine. But I do also diverge into other subjects - especially New Zealand, rugby, economics, developing world, politics and topics of general Christian and/or medical interest.
DeleteHahahaha wow this is such bs. Can't understand how people believe this crap and find justification for it
ReplyDeleteNow you can comprehend why the world is such a facking mess. They not only believe it, they think it is real, vital knowledge.
DeleteJesus Christ believed and taught these things. If people followed his teaching the world would not be a mess. The world is a mess because of human sin.
DeleteConsidering most wars and conflicts throughout history have been between religious groups whose opinions of a supernatural being differ fractionally from one another, I find the above statement wholly inaccurate and very offensive.
DeleteWhat religions did Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and Hitler follow?
DeleteHitler used religion (Catholic subtype) to his purposes. Stalin did exactly the same. In any case, this is totally irrelevant to the discussion, because WWII was not fought because of religion. And atheism is not a religion, as an educated doctor should really know ;)
DeleteA good bunch of bloody crusades and this nice, still running institution we know as the inquisition (it's under a new name now, though), on the other hand... thanks, christianity for those! Or what about GWBush and his "message from god" that told him to bomb Iraq flat?
Yeah, the national socialist Germany did what they did to jewish people, gypsies, homosexuals and other people they didn't like - or were useful scapegoats - but that was not the excuse for the war or the reason for it.
Atheism, like theism and pantheism is a world view.
DeleteI don't accept that Stalin and Hitler were practising Catholics nor that there is any justification in Catholicism for their actions. It is profoundly intellectually dishonest to blame Catholicism for what they did.
As Jesus said, 'by their fruit you shall know them'.
What religion do YOU think Hitler was, then? He may not have been your idea of a Catholic, but he'd be an odd kind of atheist who referred to 'my Lord' so much.
DeleteIt's convenient to deny someone belongs to your religion when they embarrass you, isn't it?
DeleteAnd the "fruits" of the established "Christian" churches are arange of stuff - vast wealth for poncing around and a history of brutal subjugation of differing views
DeleteFuck them and the often fetid ancient guff they trawl for flakey support for their bollocky pronouncements.
It is Jesus Christ and the apostles who define the beliefs and boundaries of the Christian faith. If you want to know more about Christianity look to them and not to followers of the Prince of Darkness like Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot and Mao.
Deletei Jesus Christ and the apostles who define the beliefs and boundaries
Deletethey're merely characters in texts codged together to suit the political needs of an earlier set of flakey bullshitters
no reason to believe that the pronouncements in the Bible are in any way purer/free of bias and bollocks than any later flummery by religoid creeps
Nice phrase 'intellectually dishonest'. Sums you up. I hope I never have to be treated by you.
DeleteThat god sounds dreadful. I think I'll make up a nicer one.
ReplyDelete:-)
DeleteThere's always the flying spaghetti monster (reformed, of course)
DeleteRamen.
DeleteHow do you justify what the bible says should be done about women who cannot prove they are virgins? Oh I know by saying :
ReplyDelete"the bible is a collection of made up stories written by a collection of iron age nomadic shepherds and has no relevance the modern world", easy....
God keeps his promises?
ReplyDeleteWhat about when Jesus promised the disciples that he would return before they died?
Perhaps he did return, often, but decided not to tell anyone after what happened to him on his first visit.
DeleteIf you want to know what Jesus said would happen before his return read the Olivet discourse in Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21.
DeletePeter,
DeleteInteresting stuff indeed and I think you do well to allow comments to the extent you do.
As a translator, however, I find invitations to "read this, read that" from Biblical texts extremely problematic.
Not only are the vast majority of original texts patchwork compositions using ancient tongues largely inaccessible to the general public, but there are also many, many different translations, in English alone.
I would ask you to consider the oddity of inviting someone to read a) e.g. koiné Greek or b) a translation of the same, without citing the exact translation, if you expect such arguments from authority to have any such authority in any sense whatsoever.
With regard to the above, if you do not yourself read NT Greek then you are quite literally "taking someone else's word for it" -- not just for this particular citation but, apparently, for the way in which you have chosen to lead your life.
That I find strange, I must confess. Much stranger, in fact, than other Christian religious traditions such as personal witness, revelation, &c.
As you know the Bible was originally written in Hebrew (most of OT), Greek (NT) and Aramaic (some small parts of OT).
DeleteThese three languages are well understood and the biblical text is well established. Furthermore good critical commentaries based on the original languages are widely available.
There are of course some variations in manuscripts and in interpretation but these do not affect any key historical claim or core doctrine.
>biblical text is well established.
Deletewell established as being a load of blethery ancient guff made up by bullshitters to suit their scam of the day. Texts attributed to whoever they fancied would give it extra gloss (eg "Paul") - all with an ungainsayable magic pixie motif added whenever they felt the need for an added level of bollocks. All then picked over by a team of editors to suit a developing Romano temporal politico-religoid scam.
aq steaming heap of guff being picked over for gobbets of toss to suit your prating pontificating - what a creep.
This blog seems like the ravings of a delusional person. It's amazing that someone with even the basest level of education could believe this carefully balanced stack of myth and superstition.
ReplyDeleteA delusion is an unshakeable false belief. The beliefs expressed in the blog post above are not delusions because they are not false.
DeleteHowever the belief that there is no God is a delusion if unshakeably held because it is not true :-)
Peter, you left me speechless with your stunning argumentation. Thanks! :D
DeleteYou have no proof that your beliefs are true, therefore you are deluded. Personal belief in the absence of evidence is not proof, it's delusion. It's actually quite simple, unless you are deluded, as you clearly are.
DeleteI don't know any Christians whose faith is not based on evidence.
DeleteSo you're saying the existence of the Christian god can be proven with evidence
DeleteGo ahead: present your evidence and prove it..
Oherwise your beliefs are not evidenced and you are deluded.
I was a Christian for nearly 4 decades with no evidence. I was indoctrinated into the church by my grandmother. I believed it, much like Santa Claus, because I was told it was true by the adults in my life whom I trusted. I hope you don't mind me posting a link to my blog post which satirises this point. http://www.thesentientpuddle.com/?p=24
DeleteI was a Christian for so long via my own apathy. It was examining the evidence that led me to the truth. If you have any evidence that affirms your beliefs, I would like to hear of it.
Examining the evidence took me in the opposite direction. What sort of church were you in?
DeleteI was raised a Presbyterian. I posted above the evidence that led me away from a belief in God. Would be interested in any evidence you have that showed the opposite.
DeleteOne more reason for my disbelief, is the problem with using God as a creator, but not needing a creator himself. I have read other posts in this blog that says we only need an explanation for things that have a beginning. God has no beginning and so needs no explanation. This is a cheat. And I will add, 2 questions; 1. How do you know God has no beginning? It says he has always existed, but if we take that to be from our perspective, than that is only from when time began with the creation of our universe. It does not preclude God from having a beginning from his own vantage point.
2. How would God know he has no beginning?
God is outside the space-time continuum and therefore outside time. It is meaningless to talk of him having a beginning.
DeleteAgain, he is outside our space-time continuum. Not his own. It is impossible for him to be outside his own. Our own location and clock is something that we each take with us wherever we go. If I travel at the speed of light then then rest of the universe speeds up and I can effectively travel into the future. But my own space-time continuum is a constant. Always.
DeleteThe bible written from a mankind point of view can see that God has always existed, but God's own point of view would be very different.
Fascinating that you think God exists within a space time continuum. How do you know this?
DeleteWhere do you think he exists?
DeleteTo ask where an omnipresent and transcendent being exists is not a helpful question. God is everywhere within the space time continuum but also present outside it.
DeleteHow do you know this?
DeleteI refer the the honorable member to the answer I gave some moments ago
DeleteAnd how do you know this?
DeleteCongratulations, you can now justify any abomination with "god wants it to happen". You've abandoned whatever concept of morality you had in favor of blind obedience to a book. Hopefully you're one of only a few that do this.
ReplyDeleteThere are about 560 million evangelical Christians worldwide who believe in the authority of the the Bible. Many of the world's remaining 1.7 billion Christians would also take it very seriously.
DeleteGod needs to go on trial for ethnic cleansing.
ReplyDeleteWho would be the judge and what would be the basis of morality on which he would be judged?
DeleteHis own rules! Come on! How can you be a scientist and voided of any logic. It baffles me.
DeleteYou should be ashamed of daring to send such stuff to Richard Dawkins. You would do better to just keep all this bullshit for your personal pleasure. Why do you imagine for an instant that it might interest Dawkins and his readers?
ReplyDeleteWell, a lot of us have found a new ignorant numpty to laugh at...
DeleteIn the four hours since Dawkins retweeted about 5,000 people have viewed this blog post. I would argue that that constitutes a level of interest.
DeleteThere's a Youtube video of a butt scratching, finger sniffing chimp that's been viewed over 28 000 times. People obviously find that more interesting than what you have to say... Just putting things into perspective.
DeleteI'm stealing that "carefully balanced stack of myth and superstition" line. Brilliantly put.
ReplyDeleteMy gift to you Walter. Take it out into the world.....
DeleteIt's simply Christian theism. It is only myth if Christianity is not true. What's your case for that?
DeleteChristianity is based on the bible being fact. Starting from the first chapter of the bible, it states that the universe, and specifically the earth and all life on it was created over the course of a week several thousand years ago. The opening page demonstrates that the bible isn't fact.
DeleteWhere does it state that? Can you give me chapter and verse?
DeleteThe end of Genesis 1:05 is "there was evening, there was morning - the first day." Similar wording marks the first 6 days of creation.
DeleteThe Hebrew as I understand simply says 'one day' after each phrase. The days are not numbered first, second etc in the text. The seventh day is incomplete. The word translated day does not mean 24 hours elsewhere in Scripture. The sun and moon do not come until the fourth day but you cannot have a 24 hour day without the sun. These are some of the problems with taking the text to mean seven consecutive 24 periods. The text of Genesis 1 allows for a longer time period and fits with prophetic/poetic descriptions. I don't have a problem with it.
DeleteWell Peter, if you had a problem with it, you would be where I am. :-)
DeleteYou also cannot create the Sun after the Earth was created. Like I say, it is obviously a false account. And it removes credibility from the bible as an authoritative source.
No Shane it is simply poetry/prophecy. If you realised what kind of document it was you would perhaps be where I am :-)
DeleteIt's arranged in three pairs of space/contents: heavens (day 1) filled by sun, moon, stars (day 4); sea and sky (2) f/b fish and birds (5); land and plants (3) f/b animals and man (6)
I had not heard it put that way before. So how does that track with:
DeleteExodus 20:11
11 For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day.
Exodus 31:17
17 It will be a sign between me and the Israelites forever, for in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day he rested and was refreshed.’”
There are different ways of interpreting these verses. Have you read John Lennox's 'Seven days that divide the world'? If not you should.
DeleteDoesn't sound like a god worthy of my worship!
ReplyDeletePlease describe the kind of God that would be worthy of your worship.
DeleteI believe the humanoid progenitors revealed in TNG 6:20 are worthy of worship.
Deletecf. en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/The_Chase
Of course, there is also a pretty compelling case to be made for worshiping the Bajoran Prophets.
Good luck to you.
Delete"God regards sin as serious and will bring judgement"
ReplyDeleteSeems that God would not be omniscient if He's got to wait for your death to judge you ...
Actually, being omniscient and "out of the time", He has known forever, even before the sixth day, that you'd be a sinner.
Actually, being omnipotent Creator, He chose to make this particular world in which you were a sinner. Even before you existed and could make any choice, He chose to make you a sinner.
So who is He judging anyway?
Read Romans 9
DeletePrecisely. Roman 9 sets the stage but does not draw the conclusion.
DeleteGod gets mad at the sinner, whose sins God Himself chose and designed. As if the potter made some pottery "for common use" and then got mad at it because it is "for common use".
It's either pervert or nonsensical.
Human free will does not exist for an omniscient creator; therefore there can be no "judgment".
It's breathtaking that you, a mere human being, dare to judge God.
DeleteI do think a mere human being is entitled to judge a mere fictional character. Don't you dare to judge Zeus, Voldemort or Dr. Strangelove ?
DeleteOn the other hand, you seem to have no moral values if you accept that a creator may punish his creation for being exactly as it was created.
Aha. It's a fallen creation - not as created.
DeleteDo you mean that God did not know that His creation would fall when he created it?
DeleteEither God is omniscient, he knew all along of the Fall, i.e. he chose to create a world that would eventually fall.
Or God is not omniscient, he was taken aback by Adam's choice, he is clueless regarding human decisions, and he watches, baffled, human history as it unfolds.
Which one is right?
God knew all along of the Fall and he knew that the price of giving human beings free will was that some would use it to rebel against him permanently.
DeleteHe then intervened at great personal cost to himself, through Christ, to rescue his fallen creatures.
However some, still choose to shake their fists at him, mock those whom he had saved and obstinately go their own way to destruction.
There are those who embrace God as creator and saviour and say, 'thy will be done'.
There are also sadly others to whom God says, 'thy will be done' and he gives them their wish.
He lets you choose which group you wish to be in so don't blame him for how it turns out if you refuse to be rescued.
If God is omniscient, then whatever happens is His will. The way things turn out is the way God wanted them to turn out, otherwise he would not have been omniscient when he created the world.
DeleteGod chose to create man a sinner, since that's the way things turned out. God himself chose who exactly among us would be shaking their fists at him, so why should he punish them?
Apparently Jeanne Calment didn't get the memo on the 120 year restriction.
ReplyDeleteMany people both before and after the flood lived more than 120 years but ages came down rapidly afterwards. There are one or two exceptions but 120 years as the ceiling is pretty accurate. Apparently genetically programmed, quite possibly something to do with telomerase.
DeleteFeeble wriggling crap - caught out making ridiculous claims based on a load of old drivel
DeleteHaha! This is great!
ReplyDeleteWhen I started reading this I thought it was an anti-christian post. Finished reading it and still consider it an anti-christian post. A shame most people don't get that.
And, by the way, I know of people older then 120... How can that be?
If there is anything in the post that is inconsistent with biblical teaching then by all means point it out. Re ages I refer the honorable member to the answer I gave some moments ago.
Delete122 years old: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanne_Calment
ReplyDeleteSee above
DeleteUhmmm...excuse me...the Exodus?...Moses who? This is what happens when fairytale stories get passed on as real life events. Sad that people in the 21st century believe this stuff.
ReplyDeleteAnd your evidence that Moses didn't exist and that the exodus didn't happen? I'm sure our Jewish readers are most interested to hear.
DeleteActually it is up to you to prove he did not theother way around. Referring to a book nearly two millennia old does not constitute evidence, especially considering so many things stated in said book can be proven false.
DeleteIf we wish to know what happened 2,000 years ago then written records from that time are precisely the kind of documents we should be consulting.
DeletePlease go ahead and disprove the existence of Moses and the historicity of the Exodus. I'm sure our Jewish readers will be very interested to see your 'evidence'.
I was amused to see links to bible stories inserted as if they were academic references!
ReplyDeleteJesus and the Apostles did it too.
DeleteMay the Lord bless you.
DeleteDidn't have to read very far before I came across the first error; the longest lived person ever was 122 years and 164 days old when they died (French woman by the name of Jeanne Calment). Try again...
ReplyDeleteSee above. The exception proves the rule.
DeleteIt's not a general rule that you were claiming. You were specifically claiming a copper- bottomed, God ordained diktat plucked from a load of ancient toss to tart up your bullshitting with a magick ungainsayable motif.
DeleteIt is a fact that there is a ceiling on human longevity at about 120 years. The Bible is right about this.
DeleteThis article lacks sanity.
ReplyDeleteSo God's chosen people handed himself over to the Romans to be put to death on a cross. You couldn't make this stuff up...oh wait, someone did.
ReplyDeleteYes you have it. God's chosen people handed God over to the Romans to be crucified. And his death and resurrection provided the means by which they could be forgiven.
Delete"...by which they could be forgiven..." of the sins which god had lumbered them with in the first place. Your god doesn't seem too bright.
DeleteSo God sacrifices himself to himself to save us from himself. As HarryR said, he doesn't seem too bright. He could have said "I forgive you" but no, your loving caring 'father' needs a blood sacrifice. He's the sort of God I don't want to know.
DeleteThey didn't take his offer of forgiveness did they? His chosen people still deny the Son of God was the Messiah.
Delete>his death and resurrection provided the means by which they could be forgiven.
Deletewak a fucking doodle - what a splendid level of weirdo creepy shite
on what planet does such freaky blood crazed death cult magickery make sense ?
It's like Harry Potter on drugs.
In the book of kings the Israelites were winning the battle agait the moabites, until the moabite king sacrificed his son, which turned the tide against the Israelites. If there is only one god then it must have been the Israelite god that accepted his human sacrifice and allowed him to kick the Israelites arses
ReplyDeleteHey Peter, why don't you respond to the point made about your God accepting a blood sacrifice?
DeleteMy Spirit will not contend with[a] humans for ever, for they are mortal;[b
ReplyDeletea or My spirit will not remain in
wooooo, perhaps she became some sort of zombie
did they teach you that at medical school - or is it just extrapolation from flakey ancient guff
b Or corrupt
some certainly seem prone to making up fantastical drivel and supporting it with fuck all but references to the often fetid rambling of ancient bigots, spivs and loons
>the interface of Christianity and Medicine
ReplyDeletesuch as stopping treating 119 year old patients so as not to interfere with some shitty God concept's plans as revealed in the rambling guff of ancient loons
Is that for real? Head banging bible-literalist Christians believe no human lifespan can be longer that 120years because it was so decreed by The Big Fella after The Flood? It's like learning a bizarre technicality in chess or The Glass Bead Game that most people never get exposed to.
DeleteAs dreadful, sad, delusional and made up all those excuses for religious violence is in the story that is posted here, by someone who clearly needs a serious intellectual wake up call... I am very happy to see mostly rational responses in the comments.
ReplyDeleteWill Christians hire a public relations consultant who might point out to them that defending the killing of whole tribes of men, women and children is not good PR?
ReplyDeleteTry getting professional marketing advice and see if the image of Christianity improves.
What have you got to lose?
The aim is not good PR but simply to tell the truth about how one can be saved. You will find the answers linked above.
Delete...yes please...I'd like to be saved from an imaginary scary place that doesn't exist. Where do I sign up?
DeleteThe Almighty Flying Spaghetti Monster decreed that no one should live beyond 122 years and 164 days. A mystical tramp told me, and since no one has lived longer than that, then it proves both the existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and that the tramp was really a prophet.
ReplyDeleteTell us where we can find this mystical tramp so we can listen to his teachings and make up a book of nonsensical drivel that we will try to force everyone to believe in for the next two millennia and use as an excuse to kill those that don't.
DeleteThese people are not delusional nuts, they are dangerous. Religion is about power and control facilitated through fear. why did I hit 32yr old before I read any major publicised critique of religion (good delusion) when I live in a liberal educated allegedly secular country. Look at the hatred and anger toward Dawkins and his book. Religion is dying so they will get even more dangerous to cling to power and authority, and focus more on kids because religion feeds on the vulnerable.
ReplyDeleteChristianity is growing faster than at any time in history. I can't say I know anyone who hates Dawkins. Most of the Christians I know just feel sorry for him.
DeleteIt is mutual, I'm sure.
DeleteAnd do you have numbers of conversation rates to back up that claim?
The numbers in Christianity he is referring to will likely be those who have been baptised. That is to say babies who can't even form a concept of God in their head much less than actually believe. Those who realise the truth about religion once they are old enough to do it will rarely get themselves removed from the church records making any quote of numbers of Christians wholly inaccurate.
DeleteI was baptised and will still be in church records as a Christian but haven't believed in over 25 years, so if I am a person you would like to include just to keep your numbers inflated, your religion is in a much worse state than I had hoped.
give me a child until he's seven - and I'll fuck him up
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-17458376
The evidence is their own historical records. Are you suggesting that the Jews lied about their history? If so what is your evidence for that?
ReplyDeleteMay the Lord bless you. I hope you find him.
ReplyDeleteMay the Lord bless you
ReplyDeleteWhere is your evidence that the Nazis believed they were acting on God's instructions?
ReplyDeleteAre you discounting the Jews own historical records? Do you do the same for all other civilisations as well or is it just the Jews?
ReplyDelete1) German soldiers of the Nazi period having "Gott mit uns" on their belt buckles?
ReplyDelete2) And both Catholic and German Protestant churches signing treaties ( "concordats") with Adolf shortly after he was made Kanzler agreeing not to sermonise against the Nazi govt 's policies in return for Adolf allowing them to control education ( in an increasingly Nazified society where the schoolkids were all members of Hitler Youth or BDM) and support of his plan to invade Soviet Union and destroy Communism - always regarded by the religious as the real enemy due to its non-religious dogma.
Do you dispute either of these assertions?
You mean the same history that denies jesus was the son of god? You're rather picky about which parts of other religions you believe in, aren't you. How do you explain the muslims "historical evidence" that jesus wasn't crucified?
ReplyDeleteMy feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison! To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before, the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross.
ReplyDeleteAdolf Hitler (Munich speech, 12th April 1922)
Muslim 'evidence' comes from 7th century 'revelation', 600 years after the crucifixion. It is not eye-witness evidence and actually contradicts that of eye-witnesses. No serious historian doubts the historicity of Jesus' crucifixion. It is attested in both Christian and secular sources.
ReplyDeleteOnly some first century Jews denied Christ's divinity. The early Christian church was entirely Jewish and the twelve disciples and Paul, who largely wrote the New Testament, were all Jews.
May the Lord bless you even more
ReplyDeleteMay the Lord bless you.
ReplyDeleteReally scary that a qualified and supposedly educated doctor can spout this stuff. What an invitation to genocide -
ReplyDelete"If he decides to wipe a nation out, in this case by using the nation of Israel as his instrument, then that is his prerogative"
Obviously 'he' can't say who should and shouldn't be wiped out, so that's down to his 'representatives' on earth...
- I suggest you find someone else to do your thinking for you.
You have to keep reminding the flakey conceit?
ReplyDeleteWhat a daft palaver.
1. The nations belong to God
ReplyDeleteYou are begging the question. You cannot quote scripture for evidence of itself.
2. Human beings are mortal
Really? I couldn't tell.
3. God is sovereign over the nations
Then why were there so many gods before AND after this scripture was written?
4. God is incredibly patient
Is he? He wasn't patient when he decided to wipe out the earth of humans because he hated them. He's quite a dick for letting "his people" suffer but letting the pagans do whatever. Sounds like a jerk more than a patient, humble entity. And how could God suffer? it's not possible for him to - I mean... hello... he's God. Suffering isn't perfection, God is perfection, God cannot suffer.
5. God regards sin as serious and will bring judgement
God made rules to punish people for doing things he knows they will do. Sounds like a self-righteous ass instead of an all-loving God. And he hates "fags" yet we are called to love everyone. Contradict much?
6. God delivers on his promises
That'll be the day... He promised to take care of me yet I was left fatherless, abandoned by most of my family, without money, with a mother who had to work two jobs just to support me... yeah way to deliver on that promise. My life is much better once I stopped believing in his nonsense.
7. God will protect his people
Again, read the above. I wasn't protected from s**t. Just because I'm alive and breathing isn't a testament to his protection. I've made it on my own, and made it even better once I said eff off.
8. God disciplines his people
God's discipline is annihilation. Supposedly pagans are also his people, but their punishment is to burn in a fiery pit forever (as if its possible to burn forever...)
9. There is something far more serious than a violent death
Oh yeah? Please tell me what comes after death... life again? I die a violent death by the wrath of god, and get sent to hell to burn forever and ever... sounds like a self-righteous narcissitic jerk who can't stand people not believing him. Well stop hiding and prove your existence. Stop letting science and philosophy disprove your existence. If you're so mighty, prove it. Not supposed to question god, but he gives no reason to believe him when science and philosophy prove much more than a book written by a bunch of incompetent idiots who can't even get their stories straight between each other...
10. We all need to turn to God
Ha...ha......... ha.... I just can't go by scripture that's full of holes to tell me that I need to "turn to god" when he's turned his back on me so many times. There's no comfort in suffering other than delusions and platitudes. Maybe when he decides I'm worth showing himself to, maybe then I'll "turn to god."
No group of people that have ever committed genocide has done it without justifying it for themselves in some way. Congratulations for finding justifications for your own favourite historical mass murder. I recommend you to read the following: http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/8stagesofgenocide.html
ReplyDeletePeter Saunders, do you ever feel like your fighting a losing battle? What if you reach the end of your life and you close your eyes for the last time and nothing happens. You just die, no soul to ascend to heaven. Would your life have been wasted? Could you have done something more substantial with your life to help the poor and the down trodden. Perhaps you should live your life more like Jesus and lead with your actions and stop wasting your words here to the throngs of non-believers.
ReplyDeleteThis is why the US regards itself as a Christian nation. Americans can rationalize nuking Japan or throwing some napalm over Vietnam the same way they do it with their god. but if somebody attacks them it's terrorism, murder, the devil, etc.
ReplyDeleteIn many ways the US is a Christian nation, abhorrent to the rest of the world.
PJ should stick to playing antique Risk, and not advocate for genocide and nation cleansing. Something not subtle is telling me this man is trying to justify a Palestinian genocide.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't bother to engage in a debate with this man. What's there to debate about good holy genocides and bad child sacrifice.
Anyway, I'll go back to raping my future wife now.
Amen.
It is frightening that a group can wipe out an entire civilization and just claim they are being used by god to bring justice against their "sins." There is no accountability for religious people. They claim that it is god's will that it happened.
ReplyDeleteA non believer living a good life, who's polite and treats people with respect is condemned to punishment for eternity. A criminal, a murderer, a sexual abuser that accepts Jesus as his savior and asks god for forgiveness is rewarded after death. This sounds like a backwards way of thinking to me, but then again I wasn't alive in the bronze age when this stuff was being thought up and written.
> that of eye-witnesses
ReplyDeletewhere "eye-witness" = flakey guff recorded well after the event by bullshhitters touting a scam
>It is attested in both Christian
after the event bullshitters
>and secular sources
recording bullshitters claims at several removes
>twelve disciples and Paul, who largely wrote the New Testament
who had guff from a range of authors attributed to them as suited bullshitters codging together support for a political scam
>Only some first century Jews denied Christ's divinity
trinitarian bollocks that gained it's currency by brutal subjugation of differing positions on the flakey load of guff
The bible is full of warnings about false teachers that will twist and warp the scriptures and it instructs Christians to test teachers, and each other, to see if what they are saying is true to Gods word, or not. To do this requires a detailed knowledge of the Bible, as a whole, not as separate bits, as well as a repentant loving heart and the holy Spirit. Without the Spirit humans are stubborn and can twist anything to suit themselves, given opportunity.
ReplyDeleteThis speech quoted above goes against even the most basic understanding of the Bible, against its most important principle. Jesus died to take the punishment for our sins, as a free gift, through Gods works and grace, not ours, undeserved, so all who repent and follow him are saved, whether Jew or Gentile. Not to fight against the Jews, to save them.
Christians should stand up against warping of the Bible, as I believe some did and lost their lives for, though not all do as we are also human and by nature fallible. I believe Hitler went even further with his twisting of the Bible and rewrote it, as he found the actual teachings contained in it offensive.
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-399470/Jewish-references-erased-newly-Nazi-Bible.html I'm sure there must be better references).
This is why people should actually read Gods word for themselves, from cover to cover, multiple times, alone, as well as in mature Christian company, to develop a thorough grounding in its teachings in entirety, rather than just following blindly because someone else says to. Then politicians and false teachers will not be able to claim things are according to Gods will if they go against his word.
As to how do you find mature Christian company? By their behaviour. Do they love God? Do they love their neighbour as themselves? When they correct or instruct do they do so out of love and a wish to help people experience Gods love and forgiveness rather than out of judgement or "holier than thou"ness? Do they love other people and God enough to spread his word? Though all people, including Christians, sin, a mature Christian should be trying to follow Gods word. Nobodies behaviour is perfect in this life, including Christians, but a true believers behaviour should become more Christ-like the more they study the Bible, rather than less.
In conclusion, I do not believe Hitler loved Jesus as his actions did not follow Jesus' example or commands.
Though this life is full of injustice, it will all be paid for. My sins - past, present and future, (because I am fallible, even though if I am one of Gods children I should try not to sin), and those of all Gods people, past present and future, are already paid for, in entirety, by the only blood sacrifice capable of doing so in our place, that of God himself.