Saturday, 16 April 2011

Why I told the Daily Mail that the BBC was acting as the ‘cheerleader’ for assisted suicide

Last Friday I was quoted on the front page of the Daily Mail as saying that the BBC was acting as ‘cheerleader’ in the campaign to legalise assisted suicide.

This article amplifies those comments and gives some of the wider background.

The BBC have recently filmed a man killing himself at the notorious Dignitas suicide facility for a controversial ‘documentary’ to be fronted by celebrity author Terry Pratchett, a prominent supporter of euthanasia.

The programme, entitled ‘Choosing To Die’, due to be screened this summer, follows a 71 year old man (known only as Peter) in the late stages of motor neurone disease as he travels from Britain to the Swiss centre to end his life in the fantasy novelist’s company.

Screening the moment of a suicide victim’s death will be a first for the BBC although a Sky Real Lives programme first crossed the rubicon in doing so back in 2008.

My full newspaper statement was as follows:

‘The BBC is acting like a cheerleader for legalising assisted suicide. It is regrettable that a man’s death will be shown on screen but we are also concerned that this documentary will not be balanced. Given Sir Terry Pratchett’s position, the fear is that it will show all the supposed benefits of assisted death with very little redress.’

Terry Pratchett is already well known as a campaigner for the legalisation of assisted suicide, and provided funding for Lord Falconer’s discredited Commission on Assisted Dying.

Whilst being a patron of Dignity in Dying (formerly the Voluntary Euthanasia Society), he has, like Michael Irwin and Philip Nitschke, much broader aims than those claimed by DID, who passionately protest (methinks too much) that they want a change in the law only for ‘terminally ill, mentally competent adults’

According to the BBC website, Pratchett has a larger agenda. He believes that ‘everybody possessed of a debilitating and incurable disease should be allowed to pick the hour of their death’. He is quoted in Australia as supporting it for the boarder category of ‘seriously ill people’.

The DID website reports his aims as even more far-reaching: ‘I believe passionately that any individual should have the right to choose, as far as it is possible, the time and the conditions of their death.’

This programme will be the fifth produced by the BBC in just three years, presented by a pro-euthanasia campaigner or sympathiser, which has been specifically designed to portray taking one’s own life in a positive light.

‘I'll Die When I Choose’ (8 December 2008) was a BBC Panorama documentary fronted by Margo Macdonald MSP in the lead up to tabling her ‘End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill’ in the Scottish Parliament. The programme screened a total of four times between 8 and 14 December 2008. The bill also received massive coverage by the BBC but was overwhelmingly defeated by 85 to 16 in November 2010.

‘A Short Stay in Switzerland’ (January 2009) was a 90 minute docudrama starring Julie Walters (and written by award-winning writer Frank McGuinness) which told the story of the death of Bath GP Anne Turner at the Dignitas facility in January 2006. It screened seven times between 25 January 2009 and 27 January 2010. BBC health correspondent Fergus Walsh, who accompanied Dr Turner on her final journey, actually played himself in the film.

The 34th Richard Dimbleby Lecture, ‘Shaking hands with death’ (1 February 2010) also featured Terry Pratchett making the case for assisted suicide for patients, like himself, with Alzheimer’s disease. A hand-picked audience in the Royal College of Physicians in London signalled their approval as he described himself ending his life, by nonchalantly sipping poisoned champagne, in his back garden.

BBC East Midlands ‘Inside Out Programme’ (15 February 2010) featured a confession by producer Ray Gosling to smothering a gay lover with AIDS some years before. The story, after an exhaustive police investigation, turned out to be pure fantasy, but not until after the BBC machinery had blown it up into a massive international news story just prior to the Director of Public Prosecutions reporting on his assisted suicide prosecution criteria.

I am also aware of a sixth ‘documentary’ currently being put together, again presented by a keen advocate of legalising assisted suicide, news of which has not yet entered the public domain.

During this three year period there has not been one BBC programme presenting the opposite point of view. This is in spite of the fact that all three parliamentary bills attempting to legalise the practice in the last five years have been heavily defeated and despite the continuing robust opposition to legalisation from disability rights groups, medical professionals and faith groups.

And yet not one representative of any of these groups has been given the opportunity to put their views as prime presenter of a BBC documentary. Other than in news bulletins no specialist in palliative medicine has had access to a BBC documentary to explain the benefits of good care, no disabled person has been able to convey their anxieties about a change in the law and no faith leader has been permitted to present an alternative perspective on suffering and dying.

Specifically, no opponent of legalisation has been given the opportunity by our national (taxpayer funded) broadcaster to put to the British public, in a documentary, the arguments that have three times persuaded parliament about the dangers to vulnerable people of a change in the law.

By contrast, many proponents of assisted suicide, who have expressed a strong persistent wish to be ‘helped to die’ by their own hands, have been granted an international platform by our national broadcaster, to tell their stories in lurid detail and without cross-examination, creating the false impression that the small minority they constitute are somehow representative of all people facing suffering or death.

Each from Reginald Crew to Tony Nicklinson has his or her case highlighted in painstaking detail by the BBC usually featuring long personal interviews and often with substantial extraneous information about their lives emotively conveyed. Contrary views are either not expressed, or are at best relegated to single sentence reactionary soundbites:

Readers will recognise many of the personalities involved as household names: Anne Turner, John Close, Debbie Purdy, Raymond Cutkelvin, Diane Pretty, Daniel James, Sir Edward and Lady Downes, Nan Maitland, and so it goes on and on and on.

In each case, the power of the personal narrative is presented skillfully to shape public opinion, courtesy of the BBC with all of its publicly funded resources being brought to bear.

What is somewhat ironic about this whole process is the fact that there are strict codes about media coverage of suicide, not only from bodies like the World Health Organisation, but also from the BBC itself (on covering both suicide and also criminal acts), which are constantly and repeatedly flouted.

The WHO guidance on the media coverage of suicide is very clear:

‘Don’t publish photographs or suicide notes. Don’t report specific details of the method used. Don’t give simplistic reasons. Don’t glorify or sensationalize suicide. Don’t use religious or cultural stereotypes. Don’t apportion blame.’

The BBC it seems is going full speed in the opposite direction.

By contrast the WHO advice about appropriate media practice is largely ignored by the BBC:

‘Refer to suicide as a completed suicide, not a successful one. Present only relevant data, on the inside pages. Highlight alternatives to suicide. Provide information on help lines and community resources. Publicize risk indicators and warning signs.’

Concerns about the well-documented phenomenon of suicide contagion, especially following suicides carried out by celebrities (more on this later), and the effects of suicide on other individuals and society at large, are simply not part of the narrative when the BBC covers these issues. Instead it has adopted almost a campaigning stance.

No one is denying that the debate about assisted suicide is crucially important. This is a free democratic society and those who wish to see a change in the law are fully entitled to express their views in the public square. Furthermore it is to be expected that private media outlets will want to pursue a specific editorial line.

But with an issue as important as this one, campaigners should not have the added advantage of being able to spread their propaganda by using the publicly funded national broadcasting corporation effectively as a private public relations company and press office.

22 comments:

  1. Over the last few years I have totally lost faith in the BBC. In so many respects thay have failed to abide by their own charter... To name but a few examples:

    Charter section:
    3.1) "The BBC exists to serve the public interest."

    - CANNOT BE DONE WITHOUT IMPARTIALITY.

    4b) "The public purposes of the BBC are...promoting education and learning;"

    - WITHOUT IMPARTIALITY "EDUCATION" BECOMES BRAINWASHING.

    4e) "The public purposes of the BBC are...bringing the UK to the world and the world to the UK;"

    - SHOWING A UNILATERAL VIEW ON ANY ISSUE IS HARDLY "BRINGING THE WORLD TO THE UK" OR VICE-VERSA. ALL VIEWS MUST BE PORTRAYED TO TRULLY ACHIEVE THIS PURPOSE.

    6.1) "The BBC shall be independent in all matters concerning the content of its output, the times and manner in which this is supplied, and in the management of its affairs."

    - NEED I SAY MORE?

    23) "In exercising all its functions, the Trust must act in the public interest and, in particular,it must—(a)represent the interests of licence fee payers;(b)secure that the independence of the BBC is maintained..."

    VERDICT: THE BBC HAVE FAILED.

    The BBC Charter: http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/about/how_we_govern/charter.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is also interesting to note that a very popular TV progam in the USA called The Mentalist only two weeks ago had a very extensive piece on assisted suicide. These ideas are regularly being planted into TV shows as being acceptable and almost routine. It is very sad when a person with an illness suffers but it is only one small step from informed consent to the State taking over the function.

    I am disappointed in Terry Pratchett. I have bought his books since 1982 but no longer. He has a right to his opinions but not when he uses the vast resources of the BBC in order to do it.

    Wouldn't time and resources be better spent finding a cure for cancer and Alzheimer's and finding good and natural sources of pain relief instead of encouraging people to take their own lives in an effort to avoid suffering?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is chilling to find that we have unprincipled people in places like the BBC who use goverment resources and media to further personal opinions and help sell books writtne by them.When people deny God they then decide to play god and decide who should and should not live.Let us boycott the books by people like that and protest,write ,flood the BBC with letters to let them know what ordinary human beings believe and think.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "In each case, the power of the personal narrative is presented skillfully to shape public opinion, courtesy of the BBC with all of its publicly funded resources being brought to bear." This is such an important point, Peter. STORY (like drama) is incredibly powerful in moving and shaping people's reactions, and although I'm sure the BBC would argue that they always give space for 'comment' from contrary viewpoints that is NOT balance. Listeners/viewers identify with story. They argue or agree with debate. I'm wondering whether the BBC have ever asked you to suggest individuals who might be subjects for 'In-spite-of-everything-I-chose-to-live' stories. I'm sure you know some, like Katherine Araniello, Matt Hampson and Alison Davis.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your arguments are stupid here. The Julie Walters drama was not a pro-euthanasia show, it was a dramatisation of something that actually happened. Did you come away from watching it and suddenly believe in people's right to die? No. This is an issue people are interested in and the BBC are going to make programmes about it. If you can't tell the difference between propaganda and a television show that retold a sad story in all its gruesome detail, why not just switch off the TV?

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Julie Walters drama involved a considerable amount of artistic licence and Anne Turner (whose life and death it depicted) was accompanied by a BBC news crew to Zurich the very day after the Voluntary Euthanasia Society rebranded itself as Dignity in Dying. This was no coincidence. It was all very carefully stage-managed.

    Have a read of the WHO guidance linked above and you will see that the programme breached virtually all its recommendations with respect to suicide portrayal on the media. Some television shows are actually thinly dressed up propaganda and this was a prime example.

    Turner's children, Edward Turner and Sophie Pandit, are now lead spokespeople for DID and the convictions of Fergus Walsh, BBC health correspondent who actually played himself in the show, have never been secret.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi, interesting post. I have been wondering about this topic, so thanks for posting. I’ll definitely be subscribing to your site. Keep up the good posts

    ReplyDelete
  8. I recently came across your blog and have been reading along.
    I think I will leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading.
    Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I just found this blog and have high hopes for it to continue.
    Keep up the great work, its hard to find good ones. I have added to my favorites. Thank You.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This is really hard because all these things are happening because people fee now so depressed because of the speed in what we living, that's th reason there are many teenagers who want to kill themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is really hard because all these things are happening because people fee now so depressed because of the speed in what we living, that's th reason there are many teenagers who want to kill themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  12. spinal cord injury in different centres around the world - and about the relative merits of the several different kinds of adult and umbilical stem cells that have been used in animal experiments, or are currently being used in human trials - I wou7m
    7m.cnld recommend, for starters, the following review articles freely available on the internet.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The ONLY colon therapist who is delivering a message supportive of a special healing relationship between the brain and colon.colon therapist boston
    colonic irrigation boston
    colonic hydrotherapy boston
    colon therapy boston
    irritable bowel syndrome
    colonoscopy boston

    ReplyDelete
  14. This is really hard because all these things are happening because people fee now so depressed because of the speed in what we living, that's th reason there are many teenagers who want to kill themselves.العاب فلاش

    ReplyDelete
  15. The Julie Walters drama involved a considerable amount of artistic licence and Anne Turner (whose life and death it depicted) was accompanied by a BBC news crew to Zurich the very day after the Voluntary Euthanasia Society rebranded itself as Dignity in Dying. This was no coincidence. It was all very carefully stage-managed. Liz

    ReplyDelete
  16. ‘The BBC is acting like a cheerleader for legalising assisted suicide. It is regrettable that a man’s death will be shown on screen but we are also concerned that this documentary will not be balanced. Given Sir Terry Pratchett’s position, the fear is that it will show all the supposed benefits of assisted death with very little redress.’ James

    ReplyDelete
  17. Would you imagination only repost this kind of to the site our web site?
    One of the better to ensure credit is provided wherever it can be owing.
    Have a good a person!
    Also visit my homepage ; Genital Wart Cure

    ReplyDelete
  18. I truly do have confidence in the many aspects you’ve introduced on
    your post. They're incredibly persuading and might definitely do the job. However, your posts are quite small for newbies. May people you should increase these a lttle bit coming from up coming time frame? Just posting.
    My web page - How To Treat Genital Warts

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Would you imagination only repost this kind of to the site our web site?
    One of the better to ensure credit is provided wherever it can be owing.
    Have a good a person...
    Giay nam xuat khau

    ReplyDelete