Sunday, 4 September 2011

Defence Secretary Liam Fox gives support to measures aimed at lowering abortion rate as Cameron is branded 'gutless'

Defence Secretary Liam Fox has said he would support efforts to reduce the ‘far too high’ number of abortions. He is the first high profile politician this week to say so.

PA reports tonight that amid tensions within the coalition over a backbench bid to change the law on counselling for women considering a termination, Dr Fox said he would back anything that made people ‘think twice’.

Tory MP Nadine Dorries is currently rallying support for an amendment to the Health and Social Care Bill which would provide women who wanted it to receive counseling that was independent of the abortion industry.

Last week it was reported in a comprehensive review published in the British Journal of Psychiatry that abortion raises the risk of mental health problems by 81%.

PA however incorrectly repeats the myth perpetrated by the Guardian newspaper and believed by Prime Minister David Cameron that Dorries’ move would stop 'abortion providers' such as Marie Stopes and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service providing counselling. This is in fact not true.

Private abortion providers gained a stranglehold on taxpayer-funded abortions under the last government. In addition every accredited pregnancy advice bureau is already linked to this industry and advised by the RCOG whose members carry out most abortions.

In 1991 the NHS funded 9,197 abortions carried out by the private sector in England and Wales. By 2010 that figure had risen to 111,775 - an increase of over 1100%. In 1991 the NHS funded 10% of abortions carried out by the private sector. By 2010 that figure had risen to 93% - a total of over £60 million of taxpayers money was paid out. The growth of NHS-funded but privately-provided abortions (BPAS/MSI etc) entirely accounted for this increase.

This sort of monopoly would not be tolerated in any other ‘service’ area but it is precisely this status quo that David Cameron under the influence of Clegg/Harris/Unions has sought to cement to the cheers of the Guardian and the criticism of the Telegraph.

Cameron said earlier this week that he would oppose Dorries’ amendment and Health minister Anne Milton has since emailed MPs saying she and her colleagues at the Department of Health would also be voting against the amendment, if it comes down to a vote.

Ms Dorries today branded Cameron as ‘gutless’ and said he had supported her amendment but had been forced into a U-turn by Liberal Democrat Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg. ‘I was told by a Cabinet minister that the PM dropped it to save coalition stability,’ she told The Mail on Sunday. She added: ‘I just wish he had the guts to say outright it was Clegg who forced him to U-turn.’

Asked about Ms Dorries's amendment, Dr Fox - the Tory Defence Secretary - said: ‘I would certainly want to support any amendments that saw the number of abortions fall in the UK.

I think the level is far too high. I would certainly welcome any restrictions which enable people to think twice and get objective advice. I would actually want to see what the amendments specifically are but I'm in favour of something that sees the high level of abortions in the UK reduced.’

Fox has an excellent voting record on issues of Christian conscience whilst Cameron’s is rather wobbly.


  1. The Dorries/Field amendment is based on the supposition that abortion providers who financially benefit from the numbers of women having abortions may, covertly or overtly, influence women to opt for abortion. That's a perfectly reasonable supposition but suppostions are not evidence. And this, it seems to me, is the weakness in the argument. It would be much, much harder for opponents of the proposal to carry the day if it had been supported by evidence gleaned by, say, a bit of undercover work with taped sessions as back-up to oral reports.

    Interestingly, The Daily Mail did exactly this a couple of weeks ago - sent a young woman reporter professing to be pregnant to six or so abortion counselling providers to assess which gave the fullest information on all the options available. With BPAS/Stopes (can't remember whether she visited one or both), she did feel the counselling assumed she'd go down the abortion route and so glossed over other options.

  2. The current case shouldผลบอล encourage Christians exercising conscience on this issue. The two nurses are to be commended for their courage and Neil Addison for his ingenuity. Whlivescoreilst it doesn’t establish any new legal ground or establish new precedents


Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.