Some claim that politics and religion should not mix but God
is intimately involved in politics.
He is sovereign over the rise and fall of nations (Isaiah 40:15-14; Daniel 2:21, 4:17, 5:21). He both establishes governing authorities, and holds them ultimately accountable (Romans 13:1).
He is sovereign over the rise and fall of nations (Isaiah 40:15-14; Daniel 2:21, 4:17, 5:21). He both establishes governing authorities, and holds them ultimately accountable (Romans 13:1).
As Christians we should both pray for our political leaders
(1 Timothy 2:1-3) and be subject to them (Romans 13:1; Titus 3:1). But God has
also given us a part to play in who actually exercises civil authority. Each of us, before God and in good conscience, must make our
own decisions about voting; but we have a duty before God to ensure that we
exercise our votes wisely, thoughtfully and in an informed way.
For some the key question will be about who they would
prefer as prime minister for the next five years. But for others it will be a
matter of which specific issues they care about most and how the various
parties and candidates stand on these.
Whether we choose to vote for, or against, a particular
party or candidate, or on a specific issue, there are lots of resources to help
us reach our decision.
The Economist/IPSOS
Mori Issues Index ranks political issues in order of importance as seen by
the British public. In September 2014 Race Relations/Immigration was top with
39% followed by the Economy (30%) and the NHS (25%). The next seven were
defence (23%), unemployment (21%), education (16%), housing (15%), crime (14%),
poverty (13%) and inflation (11%).
The BBC’s ‘Manifesto Watch’
helpfully outlines where the seven main parties stand on each of these ten top
issues.
With the economy and the NHS ranking two and three
respectively, it is also worth remembering how the two are closely
interrelated.
Most of us are employed by the NHS and almost all of us,
along with our patients, rely on it for our healthcare.
In June 2014 the NHS was declared
the best healthcare system in the world by an international panel of experts
who rated its care superior to countries which spend far more on health. The Commonwealth Fund, a highly respected Washington-based
foundation, examined an array of evidence about performance in eleven
countries, including detailed data from patients, doctors and the World Health Organisation.
In the Commonwealth Fund study the UK came first out of the eleven
countries in eight of the eleven measures of care the authors looked at. It got
top place on measures including providing effective care, safe care,
co-ordinated care and patient-centred care. The fund also rated the NHS as the
best for giving access to care and for efficient use of resources.
The 30 page report titled ‘Mirror,
Mirror on the Wall’, concluded, ‘The United Kingdom ranks first overall,
scoring highest on quality, access and efficiency’.
But financial pressures are now squeezing the ability of the NHS
to deliver.
The Nuffield Trust has shown that because of population growth, ageing and cost increases, by 2020-21 the NHS will require some £30bn (25%) more than it is getting now just to maintain services at their present level.
The Nuffield Trust has shown that because of population growth, ageing and cost increases, by 2020-21 the NHS will require some £30bn (25%) more than it is getting now just to maintain services at their present level.
But whilst real
average NHS spending has increased by at least 3% per year since 1951, this
has fallen to 0.75% per year since 2010.
The major driver of this fall has been the UK’s national
debt which is now at its highest peace-time level.
When the coalition government took office in 2010 our total government debt was £811bn. But by December 2014 it had reached £1,483.3 billion (80.9% of GDP), an over 80% rise in just five years, with much more to come.
This rise is the result of accumulating annual deficits. Although the gap between annual government income and expenditure is gradually falling the total debt is actually rising.
When the coalition government took office in 2010 our total government debt was £811bn. But by December 2014 it had reached £1,483.3 billion (80.9% of GDP), an over 80% rise in just five years, with much more to come.
This rise is the result of accumulating annual deficits. Although the gap between annual government income and expenditure is gradually falling the total debt is actually rising.
This national debt matters. It must be serviced with regular
interest payments, diverting money from front-line public services.
Even at rock-bottom interest rates, the Government will spend almost half as much on debt interest in 2014/2015 as it will spend on the NHS (£52bn cf £113bn).
Even at rock-bottom interest rates, the Government will spend almost half as much on debt interest in 2014/2015 as it will spend on the NHS (£52bn cf £113bn).
As the national debt escalates, courtesy of £100bn-plus annual
deficits, and as interest rates inevitably rise, we may yet end up spending
more on government debt service than on health.
This situation clearly cannot continue and a key question
must be what kind of government is best placed to put our balance of payments in
order. Debt is a moral issue with serious consequences for families,
communities and countries.
We also face other moral threats in the health service, not
least the legalisation of assisted suicide. On this and other issues of
conscience we will want to know where our own MP stands. Recent parliamentary
votes on same-sex marriage, sex-selective abortion and three parent embryos,
for example, have been deeply disturbing.
The Public Whip
website tells you exactly how your own MP has voted on a range of crucial
issues and the Christian
Institute and CARE have
also compiled very valuable online databases on past voting records.
Let’s make use of all this valuable information in making an
informed vote that really counts this May.
But let’s also pray for the future
of our country, and health service.
Another astute post from Dr. Saunders
ReplyDeleteI say we vote to prevent pro-lifers from accessing analgesics. It's only fair.
ReplyDeleteThat's true God is involved in politics. But in my opinion, everybody should make decision about vote individualy. It doesn't mean that they shouldn't think about others life becouse this life is dependent of them.
ReplyDelete