Sunday 23 June 2013

Why did the Home Secretary let this man into the UK?

Last week I wrote to the Home Secretary Theresa May advising her about the visit of Australian assisted suicide enthusiast Philip Nitschke (pictured) and urging her to prevent him entering Britain to conduct a seminar on methods people can use to kill themselves.

Today Nitschke was detained at Gatwick airport, but eventually let into the country several hours later after having some ‘items’ temporarily confiscated by border police.

Nitschke (aka Dr Death) is an extremist and self-publicist whose presence in the UK puts the lives of vulnerable elderly, depressed and disabled people at grave risk.

His workshop in London on Tuesday under the auspices of ‘EXIT International’ now looks likely to go ahead and will advise on the sourcing, supply and use of barbiturates, helium, nitrogen and other means to commit suicide. 

In 2001, Nitschke said that his so-called ‘peaceful pill’ should be ‘available in the supermarket so that those old enough to understand death could obtain death peacefully at the time of their choosing’.

Asked who would qualify for access he replied that ‘all people qualify, not just those with the training, knowledge or resources to find out how to “give away” their life and someone needs to provide this knowledge training or resource necessary to anyone who wants it, including the depressed, the elderly bereaved, (and) the troubled teen’. 

A 2010 report demonstrated that coroners were aware of 51 Australians who had died from an overdose of Nembutal, a lethal barbiturate that Nitschke has promoted since the late 1990’s as ‘a peaceful way to die’.

Of the 38 cases fully investigated by coroners, only 11 people were known to have suffered chronic physical pain or a terminal illness before their deaths. Of the 51, 14 were Australians in their 20’s and 30’s.

Journalist Michael Cook put it to Nitschke in 2011 that ‘nearly two-thirds of the Australians who died after quaffing Nembutal... were under 60, and quite a few were in their 20s and 30s... [suggesting that] that mental illness or depression, not unbearable pain, was the reason for the suicide.’

Nitschke responded, ‘There will be some casualties... but this has to be balanced with the growing pool of older people who feel immense well-being from having access to this information, [about suicide drugs].’

In the past, Nitschke's workshops have focused on the use of drugs and gas to commit suicide, with around half the time being used to explain how Nembutal, a veterinary sedative, can be used to end life.  

He has explained to attendees the best way to administer drugs and gas in order to bring about death, and has advertised test kits for Nembutal.

Currently he is the subject of an inquiry by the Australian Health Practitioners Agency (AHPA) in connection with a company called 'Max Dog Brewing' which he has set up in order to sell nitrogen cylinders to the public. Its website claims that they can be used for home brewing (nitrogen produces the bubbles in stout) but Nitschke has admitted on Australian national media that they can equally be used to commit suicide.

The Suicide Act, as amended in 2009, states that ‘an act capable of encouraging or assisting the suicide or an attempted suicide of another person’ is illegal, ‘whether or not a suicide, or an attempt at suicide, occurs’; the emphasis is on whether the accused ‘intended to encourage or assist suicide or an attempt at suicide’.

I believe that what Nitschke has done at previous workshops falls within the scope of these offences, because the information shared was capable of encouraging or assisting an attendee to commit suicide and the workshop was intended to encourage or assist people to commit suicide by offering them advice about the ‘best way’ of doing it.

Nitschke’s activities present a real and present risk to vulnerable members of the British public.

With the growing elderly population, failure of the care system and worsening economic situation a growing number of frail, disabled, ill and depressed people in Britain will be feeling under even greater pressure to end their lives, either for fear that they will not cope, or so as to be less of a burden to relatives.

They deserve better protection from suicide predators like Nitschke than they are currently getting.

Let’s hope that no vulnerable person is ‘helped’ over the edge by attending his seminar or as a result of the inevitable media hype that will accompany his visit.

Quite why the Home Secretary allowed him into the UK remains a mystery but Britain deserves an explanation.


  1. The real question is this:

    Why are torturers with no compassion like Peter allowed to remain OUTSIDE prison?

    Perhaps seeing palliative care fail firsthand will teach you some compassion.

    1. Diseases bring suffering but palliative care brings relief.

      Nitschke preys on vulnerable people many of whom are mentally rather than physically ill.

    2. Palliative care is no panacea.

      You prey on those too weak to resist.

      As patients live longer in jurisdictions where assisted suicide (end-of-life-compassion) is legal, YOU and your ilk are actually encouraging people to take their own lives.

      Thank you for also implying that you prefer people to jump off buildings, shoot themselves or crash their cars over Nembutal.

    3. I object to being called vulnerable

  2. I think I know a lot of young people who would not be here if Mr. Nitschke had his way. And I might even add myself, who no more than 4 years ago battled depression. Had these drugs been available in the grocery store, as he suggests they should be, I know I would have been tempted. "Caring" for one group in a way that would put many, many others at serious risk of premature death: what sense does that make?

    I disagree with him on principle, but his agenda does not seem to be motivated by genuine concern for people, including the elderly. Enabling the minority that might wish to take their own lives would ceratinly have disasterous effects on the rest of the population. He calls them "casualties".


    1. Refusing treatment would have ended in your death as well, Joni. So would jumping off a building, crashing a car, slashing your wrists, or hanging yourself.

      I have been suicidal myself, for over four years in high school. I know where you're coming from.

      Your argument, while commonly trotted out, is ultimately a red herring.

  3. I am sorry but it is Peter Saunders who is an extremist and self-publicist.

  4. nice post Peter, I love your style of blogging :)
    you see, there are 2 blogs that i've found so far to be very helpful and have something interesting for me whenever i visit, this one and
    Keep it up. I will be visiting again.

  5. It is unbelievable to understand anyone spot so much useful to an interest. We're grateful I discovered that. I'm genuinely contented My spouse and i used your time to understand with in the first sections
    medical assistant schools in new hampshire


Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.