The Daily Telegraph (see here
and here)
has this week run the story of a US abortionist who is facing a potential death
sentence after being charged with the gruesome murders of seven babies and a
mother.
Dr Kermit Gosnell (pictured), who is on trial in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, allegedly ran a filthy and dangerous ‘abortion
mill’ from his clinic, where he terminated pregnancies after the state's
24-week legal limit.
24 weeks is the age beyond which babies will generally
survive in a neonatal unit although babies born
as young as 22 weeks have been known to survive in exceptional
circumstances.
The Telegraph reports
it as follows:
The 72-year-old doctor
is accused in a graphic 281-page grand jury report of forcing vulnerable women
to give birth to live foetuses, which he and his colleagues killed using a
method they called ‘snipping’.
‘He regularly and
illegally delivered live, viable babies in the third trimester of pregnancy -
and then murdered these newborns by severing their spinal cords with scissors,’
the grand jury states.
Dr Gosnell is charged
with eight counts of murder. His case has generated widespread revulsion and
rekindled the emotive and politically-charged debate over access to abortion
across America.
Prosecutors allege
that Dr Gosnell's legitimate-sounding Women's Medical Society was in fact a
‘baby charnel house’ in which foetal remains were left scattered around in
freezers, bags and jars.
Charged with seven counts of first-degree murder, Dr Gosnell
is now standing trial in a Philadelphia courtroom.
An unlicensed medical school graduate delivered graphic
testimony about the chaos at the clinic where he helped perform the late-term
abortions.
Stephen Massof described how he snipped the spinal cords of
babies, calling it, ‘literally a beheading. It is separating the brain from the
body’.
He testified that at times, when women were given medicine
to speed up their deliveries, ‘it would rain fetuses. Fetuses and blood all
over the place.’
According to the
Atlantic, the story has been played down in the American media – possibly
because the allegations of a homicidal abortion doctor don't fit into their
pro-choice narrative (more on this here, here, here, here and here)
There was also evidence of a cover up suggesting that there
may have been many other cases – from the Telegraph:
While records for most
of these are said to have been destroyed, Dr Gosnell has been charged with
seven counts of first-degree murder in cases where investigators discovered
documentary evidence.
One, ‘Baby A’, weighed
about six pounds and was breathing and moving after his 17-year-old mother gave
birth, prosecutors say. Joking that the baby was big enough to ‘walk me to the
bus stop,’ Dr Gosnell allegedly disposed of his body in a shoebox.
Dr Gosnell is also
charged with the third-degree murder of Karnamaya Mongar, a 41-year-old refugee
from Nepal, who died after being sedated.
Prosecutors claim that
before paramedics arrived, her body was rearranged to appear as though she had
been undergoing a ‘routine, safe abortion procedure’.
The clinic was raided
by the FBI in February 2010 and Dr Gosnell's medical licence was suspended.
Two academic bioethicists stirred
up huge controversy a year ago by saying that infanticide was ethically
equivalent to abortion.
Their point was that if we can justifiably abort babies
beyond 24 weeks, then it must be equally justifiable to kill them after birth
at the same (or possibly even younger) age.
Their logic is difficult to fault.
But if people are shocked by infanticide– and I hope that
most are especially after reading a story like this – then they should surely be
equally questioning late abortion.
There were 2,729
abortions carried out in England and Wales in 2011 on babies at 20 weeks
gestation or beyond, of which 146 were beyond 24 weeks.
No wonder that sections of the American media were reluctant
to run the story.
I wonder how much of the British media will touch it.
PS. Finally, on 16 April there is massive media coverage on both sides of the Atlantic after the BBC covered it on 15 April..
PS. Finally, on 16 April there is massive media coverage on both sides of the Atlantic after the BBC covered it on 15 April..
I think, as you say, the UK media will not want to raise this and is is noticeable that the 'pro-choice' lobby are strangely silent.
ReplyDeleteAs was said by Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva there is, morally, no difference between this act and any abortive process.
It is incredible, simply incredible, that the mainstream press has ignored this story. (The treatment of the mothers alone is disturbing beyond words.)
ReplyDeleteI can only conclude that it raises too many uncomfortable questions for too many people.
Its when you read a story such as this that convinces me that there is evil in this world.It is the same evil that sent millions of Jewish men women and children to be gassed ...its the same evil that massacres the innocent in Syria Iran North Korea and yes killing 6 of your own children because you've lost thousands of pounds from your welfare payments. God has been cast into the wilderness and society is now paying the price for inviting in His place the author of such evil. Evil acts such as this will go on unless society turns back to The Lord but my hopes are not that high that it will do so.
ReplyDeleteI wrote a piece myself a couple of days ago, so far well-received, about the question put to Planned Parenthood, "What should happen to a baby born alive after a botched abortion?", and this story about Dr Kermit Gosnell, with a touch of black humour. It's called, "Thinking outside the botch".
ReplyDeleteI would be honoured if you'd pay a visit, and maybe even add a comment, yourself, including (if you wouldn't mind) a link to this piece.
http://http://johnallmanuk.wordpress.com/2013/04/13/thinking-outside-the-botch/
The posts "The mumbo-jumbo of choice" (about the metaphysical arguments pro-choicers use) and "B*ggers CAN be choosers!" (with an argument against same sex marriage in it that you won't have heard before) are also worth reading.