The world’s
fourth richest person, Warren Buffett, ploughed
$1.23 billion into abortion groups over eleven years, a media watchdog
has found.
The Media
Research Center (MRC), which analysed tax returns for Buffett’s foundation,
labeled him the ‘king
of abortion’.
The MRC
says the money given ‘is enough to pay for the abortions of more than 2.7
million babies in the womb’ – which, it points out, equates to the entire city
of Chicago.
MRC’s
report lays out the money Buffett’s foundation gave between 2001 and 2012,
saying it amounted to $1,230,585,161.
The money
was given to groups which either ‘provided abortions themselves or advocated
for abortion or access to abortion’.
Warren
Buffett has made his money through investments, and is listed by Forbes as
having a net worth of $65.4 billion.
According
to Buffett biographer Roger Lowenstein, Buffett has a ‘Malthusian dread
that overpopulation [will] aggravate problems in all other areas – such as
food, housing, even human survival.’
This fear of an overcrowded planet is at least in part what
gives him his enthusiasm for abortion. I guess he thinks that if there were
more people on the planet his wealth might have to be shared.
Buffet is not alone amongst the mega-rich in having a record
of funding population control. Also previously implicated are
Ted Turner (founder of the Cable News Network), Bill Gates of Microsoft, David
Packard, co-founder of Hewlett-Packard and financier George Soros.
In a similar way the pro-assisted suicide campaign in the UK
has been bankrolled by wealthy businessmen.
Lord Falconer’s Assisted Dying Bill, which seeks to legalise
assisted suicide for mentally competent adults with less than six month to
live, follows on from his highly controversial Falconer Commission which laid its framework.
This was conceived by Dignity in Dying (DID), the former
Voluntary Euthanasia Society, manned by euthanasia sympathisers and funded by
DID patrons Terry
Pratchett and Bernard Lewis.
Bernard
Lewis is the English entrepreneur behind the River
Island fashion brand and clothing chain and is estimated to be worth
£1,030m (€1,484m).
Terry
Pratchett is an English novelist who has a net worth of £42 million
according to the Sunday Times Rich List.
They are small fry compared with Buffet and Gates but very
well-endowed by UK standards.
Baroness Warnock is a moral philosopher who believes that
elderly people suffering from dementia should consider ending their lives
because they are a burden on the NHS and their families.
She said in 2008 that pensioners in mental decline are
‘wasting people's lives’ because of the care they require and insisted there
was ‘nothing wrong’ with people being helped to die for the sake of their loved
ones or society.
The 84-year-old added that she hoped people will soon be
‘licensed to put others down’ if they are unable to look after themselves.
It deeply troubles me when I hear of very wealthy and
powerful people using their money to finance efforts to legalise medical
killing through abortion, assisted suicide or euthanasia.
I wonder if part of the motivation is to protect their
personal wealth from those who might have calls on it for care, support or
treatment.
The real heart of a society is revealed in the way it treats
vulnerable people – especially the unborn, elderly, sick or disabled. Does it make sacrifices for vulnerable people or does it choose rather to
sacrifice them?
These rich men all use the language of autonomy, choice and
compassion but taking another person’s life through abortion or euthanasia, or
helping them to kill themselves through assisted suicide, is actually to
eliminate all future choice.
In stark contrast stands the life of Jesus Christ, creator
and sustainer of the universe, who gave himself for us when we were helpless
and weak:
‘For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ,
that though he was rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so that you by
his poverty might become rich.’ (2 Corinthians 8:9)
‘For while we were still weak, at the right
time Christ died for the ungodly. ‘ (Romans 5:6)
Peter, there are few things more profitable than torturing people by keeping euthanasia illegal.
ReplyDeleteEspecially for pharmaceutical companies.
>> I guess he thinks that if there were more people on the planet his wealth might have to be shared
ReplyDeleteStupid thing to say, Peter - you undermine your argument by such stupendous ignorance. The man gives away more than he keeps, and lives very simply. There are chavs in Britain who lead more luxurious lives than Buffet.
Much as one dislikes his bankrolling of abortion, his motivation, whatever it is, is unlikely to be selfish..
Melinda Gates is a practising Roman Catholic. Do you have any references to show that Bill Gates has bankrolled abortion in the past? Not that I don't believe you, but I have never heard of the Gates' being advocates for abortion.
ReplyDelete