A bill to legalise voluntary euthanasia in New Zealand has
been withdrawn amid fears it would become a political football.
Labour MP Maryan Street (left) withdrew her End of Life
Choice Bill on 26 September before the member's bill ballot saying that she
didn’t want it debated in election year.
She claimed that the move was ‘simply pragmatism’ and that
she ‘absolutely’ planned to put it back in the ballot after the election.
Street was believed to have been pressured by Labour party colleagues
to withdraw the bill amid concerns that some would have to campaign against it,
distracting from the rest of the campaign.
This bill (see draft here) is opposed
by the New Zealand Medical Association (NZMA], Hospice New Zealand and the
Catholic Bishops Conference. The Chairman of the NZMA has said, ‘euthanasia is unethical and cannot be
condoned’.
Professor Emeritus David Richmond, spokesperson for
Euthanasia-Free New Zealand, welcomed
the move and said that the withdrawal would provide the much needed time to
educate the NZ community and Members of Parliament about the hazards of
legalising euthanasia.
‘Public opinion polls that appear to show a majority in
favour of legalising euthanasia reflect the one-sided nature of the debate thus
far in New Zealand – largely the fault of the media - the simplistic nature of
the questions asked and the ignorance of the majority of New Zealanders about
the wider issues involved,’ he said.
He called for a redoubling of efforts on the part of all
groups and organisations opposed to the Bill to alert the public to the danger
to society, including the loss of human freedom, that accompanies legalised
euthanasia.
As I have reported
before, Street’s draft bill is very broad in scope proposing that
euthanasia be open to people with terminal illness likely to cause death within
12 months, or to people with an irreversible physical or mental condition that
renders their life unbearable - by their own assessment.
The delay will give campaigners in New Zealand a well needed reprieve to educate the public about strong arguments against changing the law. I hope they make the very best of the opportunity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.